About
About
CAMPAIGN #1
Chipping away at our Constitutional Rights and precious liberties …
LEGAL CASE #1 – Cherokee County
Was B.O.E. “Conspiracy to Commit Election Fraud” Uncovered After Accusing an Elector of Three Felonies when Attempting to Vote?
The 1st & 14th Amendment Rights of Elector Richard Jordan may have been violated on June 17th, 2022, during the General Primary Election Run-off based on the premeditated attempt by Election Officials to obstruct and deny an Elector his right to vote without interference.
After appearing before the Georgia State Elections Board approximately one year after the precarious circumstances occurred during a bizarre polling center incident, Elector Jordan’s attorney effectively neutralized an attempt at malicious prosecution in Cherokee County BOE allegations:
- 21-2-566 – Interference with the Primaries (Felony) DISMISSED
- 21-2-567 – Intimidation of Electors (Felony) DISMISSED
- 21-2-569 – Interference with Poll Officers (Felony) DECRIMINALIZED
- 21-2-597 – Intentional interference with performance of election duties
- 21-2-583(3) – Removal or destruction of election supplies (DISMISSED)
- 21-2-413(e)- Use of photographic equipment or other electronic devices within a polling place (DISMISSED)
*The remaining misdemeanor allegations are being vehemently opposed
To the contrary, Criminal Referrals against the Elections Director, staff and former B.O.E. members are now being presented which may constitute “Conspiracy to Commit Election Fraud”. Truth will most certainly prevail in cases involving malicious prosecution.
Without effective legal representation electors are often raked over the coals and end up pleading guilty to a lesser crime, to then settle by remitting a $1,000 fine and accepting one year probation to crimes never committed. This common scenario is unconscionable and should never take place in America!
POLLING INCIDENT – Cherokee County 061722
Based on information and belief, both the Poll Manager and Assistant Poll Manager colluded with the Election Supervisor by refusing to answer an Jordan’s basic questions regarding the voting process. Rather, woke bureaucrats intentionally singled out the Elector based on his audacity to ask a question about the Dominion QR codes. Cherokee Election Officials demonstrated gross bias and prejudice against the Elector’s right to ask legitimate questions of trained poll workers regarding the use and legality of the Dominion ballot marking devices which uses a proven unreliable and unreadable QR Code.
A false police report was filed to summons law enforcement officers to further intimidate and personally harass Elector Jordan by making the false accusation of criminal trespass to law enforcement when at a South Cherokee County Polling Location. This false report tp the Woodstock Police Department was an attempt to silence an Elector to make him an example for the purpose of discouraging dissent from others. The obvious intent was to coerce the Elector into accepting the flawed policy of the Board of Elections in the continued unlawful use of the Dominion Ballot Marking Device which creates the QR code for tabulating votes.
Following the August 2020 Federal Court Ruling under the Raffensperger v. Curling case there was clear reason to believe that the use of the Dominion Ballot Marking Device created suspicion and doubt that any cast vote using a QR Code may not accurately reflect the voter’s candidate of choice.
Entering into a duly designated Cherokee County Public Polling Location on June 17th, 2022, for the purpose of casting a ballot for the Elector’s candidate of choice in the 6th District Congressional Runoff, Jordan was immediately singled out a well known vendetta held against him by the Elections Supervisor as a result of an earlier citizen petition presented demanding a paper ballot hand count of the 2022 General Primary Election.
Jordan was presented with the ultimatum to either cancel his ballot or deposit it into the Dominion tabulator ballot box without being provided any explanation of official B.O.E. policy when expressing concern about the lawful readability of the printed ballot. The Poll Manager and the Election Director would not address any questions about the use of the printed QR code that were unreadable by the Elector. When requesting to file a complaint form with the Elections Office, Jordan was filtered through three channels before reluctantly being provided a form to fill out to request an official written response from Board of Elections authorities. Following the due process of requesting a complaint form Jordan was given the ultimatum of canceling his ballot or accepting the ballot with the illegible QR code used to tabulate cast votes. After submitting the form to the Poll Manager the ballotb was promptly deposited into the ballot box.
However, while attempting to complete the form, there is reason to believe that a discrimination conspiracy unfolded for the purpose of suppressing Elector Jordan’s Constitutional Right to vote. Based on information and belief, the Poll Manager had been told by the Elections Supervisor during prior training to not respond to questions regarding the recently declared illegal Ballot Marking Device. Rather the Poll Manager was apparently instructed to immediately phone her for instructions. By her own admission, the Assistant Poll Manager then called the Woodstock Police Department and filed the false police report stating that a man was trespassing at the Poll Location and obstructing the Election Primary by asking questions and wanting to complete a complaint form. After secretly phoning the Election Supervisor, an apparent premeditated plan to use the full force of local law enforcement was unveiled to try to intimidate then prevent Elector Jordan from filing of a complaint form to request a written response explaining the county’s official policy prescribed for voting procedures.
As the law enforcement officers entered the polling premises both the Poll Manager and the Asst. Poll Manager ushered the law enforcement officer to the left side of the Elector in a direct attempt to invade his privacy while he was completing and perfecting his vote prior to casting his personal ballot. The officer was apparently coached in advance by conversation with the Election Supervisor after she deceptively informed him that the Elector was a known person for obstructing the voting process at polling locations.
Not to impugn the motives of the Cherokee Elections Officials, but a few weeks prior just before the May 24th General Primary Election, the Elector together with hundreds of Patriot citizens concerned about Election Integrity mounted a grassroots effort to collect over 159 sworn affidavits, at least three from each of the 42 precincts, properly notarized for delivery. A press conference was then held in front of the Elections Office to petition the Election Director to provide a Paper Ballot Hand Count of the top tier candidates for public office in the primary election based on appropriate Georgia Elections Statutes. The Election Superivisor would not even sign for delivery of the sworn affidavits.
Political retribution, wokeism, and administrative staff abuse must be identified and exposed in appropriate courts of jurisdiction.
SUMMARY
Following the 2022, mid-term elections after documenting many irregularities across key states, our team is preparing to fight mounting charges by Election Boards who are asserting their own version of Cancel Culture, after such wokeness seems to have penetrated conservative jurisdictions like Georgia’s own Cherokee County. Certainly a bastion of conservatism, Cherokee County with 265,000 residents is now considered the target of Leftist organizations, especially following recent defeats in traditionally conservative metropolitan Atlanta counties during the 2020 presidential election.
We need the groundswell support of Georgia citizens to stop the constant chipping away the voter’s Constitutional Rights and precious liberties! Together we can stand against the torrents of misinformation, strong-arm procedural tactics, and outright distain in following court rulings, even when we have documented evidence that the voting equipment generates marked ballots which are unreadable and unverifiable as ruled by Constitutional officer Judge Amy Totenberg in Federal Court! Curling v. Raffensperger
Our most recent court battles follow the decision to file with Superior Courts challenging the continued usage of the current Ballot Marking Devices which imprint an unreadable QR code that cannot be verified by the Elector. While at the Polling Location Electors are merely instructed to promptly follow pre-planned and coercive directives by Poll Workers to immediately deposit the unverified paper ballot into a tabulator which is then deposited into a locked-tight box and held by the Clerk of the Superior Court of the County. Any further review of confirmation of the Elector’s “Official Ballot” requires a judicial officer to issue a Court Order to authorize the unsealing of ballots. (Pickens County Mora v. Pickens County Board of Elections)
“We the People” must now set the record straight when it comes to Election Integrity!
Our decision to file with the courts of county jurisdiction, and fully evaluate practices by local Boards of Election follows several attempts by “We the People” to demand that a Paper Ballot, Hand Count be performed to verify the Dominion Voting System to prove two frailties within the Dominion Voting System:
- The Ballot Marking Device has been declared unreadable and unverifiable by a Federal Court Ruling.
- The Tabulator only reads the ballot QR image after chain of custody is relinquished to the 3rdparty vendor who maintains exclusive control of all subsequent operations using their proprietary software, which code has been proven culpable by recognized experts to breach protocol and can literally change the Elector’s vote.
This Polling Center incident described above may very well provide opportunity to expose the vulnerabilities of the Dominion Voting System by merely bringing the subject into the limelight of public discourse. The national media’s scrutiny has been on the State of Georgia in preparation for the upcoming 2024 Primary and General Elections which could very well expose the continued unlawful usage of the Dominion Voting Systems along with corruption within local county election boards.
_________________________________________________________
CHEROKEE COUNTY CASE #2
Elector Blankenship – Cherokee County Elector Accused of Attempting to Buy Votes
Leading up to the 2022, General Election Elector Jessie Blankenship was passionate about encouraging family members, friends, and neighbors to turn out to the polls on election day to vote. She even used Facebook to send her mother a private message to do the same and encourage as many registered voters as possible to vote on Election Day. In a Facebook message Jessie stated that if anyone needed a ride to the polls, a cup of coffee to get then up early, gas money, or someone to hold their hand, then she is available to help.
A year later she stood in a packed hearing room at the State Capitol after being summoned to give an account in defense of her criminal felony namely, “Intent to Buy Votes”.
Longtime Cherokee County resident Jessie Blankenship serves as a Homeschool Mom and Election Integrity Advocate as well as a Poll Worker and volunteer in local grassroots civic organizations.
Prior to the Primary Election in 2022, Jessie along with several other Poll Workers attended extensive training then were hired by the Cherokee County Election Director to assist in managing poll locations around the county. However, four of the Poll Workers which included Jessie were curious about the Dominion Voting machines used across Georgia and particularly in Cherokee County. She had just learned about the recent court order declaring the Ballot Marking Device (BMD) in a federal court to be unreadable, unverifiable, and illegal by Judge Amy Totenberg.
When the four Poll Workers began to ask questions about the Dominion Voting machines all four were immediately fired for unspecified reasons.
On another occasion Elector Blankenship joined with fifteen other volunteer citizens to canvass just over 400 Cherokee County homes in several neighborhood after identifying suspicious names of voters using another voter’s residential address. The volunteer workers displayed a lanyard around their neck with their name and citizen credentials to identify each as a volunteer canvasser.
The Board of Elections had previously contracted with a highly paid, left-leaning, attorney who together with the Elections Director contacted the local Cherokee Tribune to display a front page narrative insinuating that the four Electors may have committed a felony crime of impersonating an Election’s Officer.
Not to be overshadowed by these two acts of local county level lawfare, a felony referral was made to the Secretary of State’s office and State Elections Board after the Elections Director learned of Jessie Blankenship’s latest “brush with the law”! In the professional opinion of the outside overpaid attorney, the Facebook post made in a private message from Jessie to her mother had risen to the highest level of Criminal offense.
Living under the threat for just over one year with potential criminal incarceration and while not knowing her fate, Elector Blankenship was eventually provided expert legal counsel to represent her interest. After her attorney expressed a veracious presentation of her case during the hearing at the Georgia State Capitol Building hearing room on November 3rd, 2023, all charges were dismissed. However, while in the Hearing Room one of the Board Members publicly ridiculed Elector Blankenship regarding the seriousness of the alleged felony charges then required her to promise never to attempt to buy votes in the future. Without expert legal counsel representation, she would probably have been in the same position of most of the remaining seventeen electors who were promptly referred to the Georgia State Attorney General for criminal prosecution.
Afterward, Jessie Blankenship profusely thanked her attorney for his forthright and passionate appeal to help the four-member panel of State Election Board Members understand the error in judgement by the Cherokee County Election’s Director.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
